State Accountability
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)

The Texas Education Agency is developing a new accountability system based on the STAAR (State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness) tests as well as other indicators. Information is available at the 2013 Accountability Development site.

Note that no state accountability ratings will be assigned in 2012-2013

Texas Education Agency Division of Performance Reporting

 
Public Hearing January 22, 2013

 

Federal Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress - (AYP)

Lake Travis Independent School District met 2012 Adequate Yearly Progress

Lake Travis ISD met the AYP standard at the district level and at each campus level. AYP is part of the federal accountability system brought about by NCLB (No Child Left Behind). AYP indicators include performance and participation in state assessments in the area of Reading/English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics as well as Graduation Rate and Attendace Rates for elementary and middle schools.
More information on AYP can be found at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/ayp/2012/index.html
 
 
 
No Child Left Behind
(NCLB)
Lake Travis ISD is sharing this information about the district and our campuses as part of District’s obligations under Section 1111(h)(2) of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB).

NCLB Report Cards for the district, and each of the campuses of LTISD are now available in the links below.

NCLB Report Cards for the state as a whole, all school districts and charter schools, and all campuses are also available on the Texas Education Agency’s NCLB web site at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index4.aspx?id=2147493710

Information on these report cards includes:

  • Assessment results for the LEA and campuses in the aggregate and disaggregated by race/ethnicity, gender, disability status, migrant status, English proficiency, and economically disadvantaged showing two-year trend data for each subject and grade tested:
    • by performance level,
    • with a comparison between annual objectives and actual performance for each student group, and
    • including the percentage of each group of students not tested.
  • Graduation rates for secondary school students.
  • Performance of school district and campuses on adequate yearly progress (AYP) measures.
  • Number and names of Title I schools identified as in need of improvement, including the stage of improvement and AYP indicator missed by any schools identified for improvement.
  • Professional qualifications of teachers in the LEA and campuses, including the percentage of teachers teaching with emergency or provisional credentials and the percentage of classes in the LEA and campuses that are not taught by highly qualified teachers, including a comparison between high- and low-poverty campuses within the LEA.
 
If you have difficulty accessing the information from the web site or have questions about the information, please
contact Kathy Burbank, Director of Accountability, Achievement & Educational Technology.